September 30, 2022

Firefly TT Mk.1 INS-112 on display. Note the foothold recesses just below the observers position on either side of the roundel. The ‘Glass House’ at the Observers position in the rear does not seem to be an original and was probably scratchbuilt. The quality of the Pilot’s Canopy and the observer’s glass house is quite good. Click to Enlarge

The aircraft was probably built up from the remains of a Firefly fuselage which was extant from the firewall just ahead of the cockpit and upto the tail. The team constructed an engine cowling, spinner, propeller, cooling vents, Oil cooler air intakes on both sides of the engine cowling, a complete undercarraige and tail empennage.

While a reasonable job has been done on the main fuselage, the engine cowlings came out the worst – looking like something grafted out of a DHC-1 Chipmunk, the cowlings along with the Spinner and Propeller look out of place and completely distracts from the Firefly look. Many a visitor has emailed us asking if it was a ‘Replica’ and were flabbergasted when we told them it was an original aircraft!

The engine cowlings which seem to resemble that of the DHC1 Chipmunk are most ‘Un-Firefly’ like and is the most distracting feature of the restoration. Click to Enlarge
Click to Enlarge The Starboard view of the Firefly shows the garish Tail-wheel which seems to be borrowed from a Wheelbarrow. The ‘Indian Navy’ lettering on the rear fuselage leaves much to be desired.

The Undercarraige of the aircraft is another distracting feature. Though we have no clue as to from which parts it was fabricated, the main undercarraige looks like it is a strutted unit from Biplanes of yore. The tail wheel is too big for the aircraft and looks like it is a wheel barrow spare. It would probably have been better if the Navy had displayed the aircraft on jacks and completely removed all traces of the current u/c set up.

Others have commented that a Harvard’s tail might have been used to construct the tail empennage. Whether correct or not, the team had done good work in this area. Similar good work has been done in the pilot and observer canopy areas.

Click to Enlarge Close up of the Unidentified Undercarriage unit fixed to the Firefly. This is certainly not an original.
A closer look at the propeller hub and prop blades reveal that two (or one) of the propeller blades are fixed the wrong way! The aircraft is covered by the special covers to protect against the monsoons. Click to Enlarge

The good quality of restoration done on the fuselage is again marred by the paint job. Big Bold letters proclaim ‘INDIAN NAVY’ – a style that has not been seen on the firefly in the numerous historical photographs displayed inside the museum.

Overall while the restoration effort is appreciated, its a case of ‘what could have been’. The aircraft can still be made to good look. Remove the current undercarraige – change the forward engine cowlings and the propeller blades, fabricate an original ‘glass house’ for the observer, change the paint scheme that includes the Yellow and Black underside typical of Target Towing aircraft, we will have a winner – and a warbird that makes the trip worth visiting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: